Welcome but Different: Ethos, Humour and Rhetorical Maneuvers when Speakers are Introduced and Accept the Word

Authors

  • Jette Barnholdt Hansen Copenhagen University
  • Christine Isager Copenhagen University
  • Rasmus Rønlev University of Southern Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v21i76.52

Keywords:

introductions, epideictic rhetoric, ethos, rhetorical maneuvers, humor, performance

Abstract

This paper looks to humour and performance while studying how ethos is negotiated and distributed in relation to audiences when rhetors are introduced and accept the word. One older and two more recent examples are examined. First, bishop Lovis Henry Ford introducing president Bill Clinton in Memphis Church of Christ in November 1993, enabling a remarkable performance in terms of subject re-positioning on Clinton’s part; next, two managers at the Danish radio station Radio24syv acting as incompetent hosts and foils to high-profile employees in an award-winning ad campaign; and finally comedian Ricky Gervais hosting the Golden Globe award show, demonstratively excluding rather than welcoming each of the next speakers on stage. Together, the case studies highlight the strong potential of introductions as occasions for rhetorical maneuvering (Phillips, 2006). What may seem like a trivial ritual, has the power to destabilize rhetorical situations, offering space for dissent and negotiation of values within communities.

Author Biographies

Jette Barnholdt Hansen, Copenhagen University

Jette Barnholdt Hansen (1966-2017) var lektor i retorik ved Institut for Medier, Erkendelse og Formidling, Københavns Universitet

Christine Isager, Copenhagen University

Lektor i retorik ved Institut for Medier, Erkendelse og Formidling, Københavns Universitet.

Rasmus Rønlev, University of Southern Denmark

Adjunkt i mediesprog og retorik ved Center for Journalistik, Syddansk Universitet

References

Albeck, Ulla. Dansk Stilistik. 7. udgave. København: Gyldendal, 2000.

Andersen, Øivind. “How Good Should an Orator Be?” I The Orator in Action and Theory in Greece and Rome: Essays in Honor of George A. Kennedy, redigeret af Cecil W. Wooten, 3–16. Boston; MA: Brill, 2001.

Andersen, Øivind. “Rette ord i rette tid”. Rhetorica Scandinavica, nr. 4 (1997): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.52610/IOQA6776

Andeweg, Bas og Jaap de Jong. “De eerste minuten: Attentum, benevolum en docilem parare in de inleiding van toespraken”. Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, 2004.

Bitzer, Lloyd F. “The Rhetorical Situation”. Philosophy & Rhetoric 1, nr. 1 (1968): 1–14.

Black, Edwin. “Den andre persona”. Rhetorica Scandinavica, nr. 9 (1999): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.52610/WUXJ8406

Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1969.

Ceccarelli, Leah. “The Close Textual-Intertextual Analysis: Combining Rhetorical Criticism and Historical Research”. I Shaping Science with Rhetoric: The Cases of Dobzhansky, Schrodinger, and Wilson, 6–9. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2001.

Foss, Sonja K., Karen A. Foss og Robert Trapp. “Kenneth Burke”. I Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric, 2. udgave, 169–207. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc., 1991.

Gabrielsen, Jonas og Tanja Juul Christiansen. Talens magt. 2. udgave. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2010.

Gelang, Marie. Actiokapitalet – retorikens ickeverbala resurser. Ödåkra: Retorikforlaget, 2008. https://doi.org/10.52610/HXNR9931

Halloran, S. Michael. “Aristotle’s Concept of Ethos, or If Not His Somebody Else’s”. Rhetoric Review 1, nr. 1 (1982): 58–63.

Hansen, Jette Barnholdt. “Danish Revue: Satire as Rhetorical Citizenship”. I Rhetorical Citizenship and Public Deliberation, redigeret af Christian Kock og Lisa Storm Villadsen, 249–64. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2012.

Hansen, Jette Barnholdt og Lisa Storm Villadsen. “Temaintro: Epideiktisk retorik”. Rhetorica Scandinavica, nr. 36 (2005): 4–5. https://doi.org/10.52610/IVJX3868

Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth. Online ethos: Webretorik i politiske kampagner, blogs og wikis. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur, 2008.

Hoff-Clausen, Elisabeth. Set gennem nettet: Organisationers troværdighed på hjemmesider. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur, 2002.

Hutcheon, Linda. Irony’s Edge: The Theory and Politics of Irony. London: Routledge, 1994.

Hyde, Michael J. “Introduction: Rhetorically, We Dwell”. I The Ethos of Rhetoric, xiii–xxviii. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 2004.

Isager, Christine. “Reporteren og hans persona: Selvironi som retorisk strategi”. Rhetorica Scandinavica, nr. 26 (2003): 20–36. https://doi.org/10.52610/QBXC1590

Ivie, Robert L. “Kenneth Burke’s Attitude toward Rhetoric”. Rhetorica Scandinavica, nr. 74 (2016): 13–29. https://doi.org/10.52610/MFEG2857

Johannesson, Kurt. Praktisk retorik – 10 lektioner i kunsten at overbevise. Ödåkra: Retorikforlaget, 2006. https://doi.org/10.52610/YDMH9901

Leff, Michael C. og Ebony A. Utley. “Instrumental and Constitutive Rhetoric in Martin Luther King Jr.’s” Letter from Birmingham Jail””. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 7, nr. 1 (2004): 37–51.

McCroskey, James C. An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication. 9. udgave. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2006.

Meyer, John C. “Humor as a Double-Edged Sword: Four Functions of Humor in Communication”. Communication Theory 10, nr. 3 (2000): 310–31.

Miller, Carolyn R. “Genre as Social Action”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, nr. 2 (1984): 151–67. Se også norsk oversættelse af K.L. Berge: “Genre som sosial handling”, Rhetorica Scandinavica 18/2001, https://doi.org/10.52610/CWKE3326

Miller, Carolyn R. “Rhetorical Community: The Cultural Basis of Genre”. I Genre and the New Rhetoric, redigeret af Aviva Freedman og Peter Medway, 67–78. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis, 1994.

Murphy, John M. “Inventing Authority: Bill Clinton, Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Orchestration of Rhetorical Traditions”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 83, nr. 1 (1997): 71–89.

Perelman, Chaim. “The New Rhetoric: A Theory of Practical Reasoning”. I The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present, redigeret af Patricia Bizzell og Bruce Herzberg, 2. udgave, 1077–1103. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1990.

Phillips, Kendall R. “Rhetorical Maneuvers: Subjectivity, Power, and Resistance”. Philosophy & Rhetoric 39, nr. 4 (2006): 310–32.

Roer, Hanne. “Dramatisk, pentadisk kritik”. I Retorikkens aktualitet: Grundbog i retorisk kritik, redigeret af Marie Lund og Hanne Roer, 3. udgave, 377–407. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag, 2014.

Sprague, Jo, Douglas Stuart og David Bodary. The Speaker’s Handbook. 9. udgave. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, 2008.

Stempel, Wolf-Dieter. “Ironie als Sprechhandlung”. I Das Komische. Poetik und Hermeneutik VII, redigeret af Wolfgang Preisendanz og Rainer Warning, 205–35. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1976.

Sullivan, Dale L. “The Ethos of Epideictic Encounter”. Philosophy & Rhetoric 26, nr. 2 (1993): 113–33.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-23

How to Cite

Barnholdt Hansen, J., Isager, C., & Rønlev, R. (2022). Welcome but Different: Ethos, Humour and Rhetorical Maneuvers when Speakers are Introduced and Accept the Word. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 21(76), 22–58. https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v21i76.52

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>