Making one out of many – on the logic of populism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v24i81.22Keywords:
populism, Ernesto Laclau, antagonism, empty signifier, chains of equivalence, affect, political rhetoricAbstract
This article introduces Ernesto Laclau’s theory of populism to Scandinavian rhetorical studies. The need for such an introduction emanates from a current lack of conceptual resources to analyze manifestations of populism as crucial for democratic politics. Laclau’s theory of populism aims to explain the rhetorical processes involved in struggles of political power as well as the conflictual dimension inherent to democractic politics. It is an indispensable perspective for rhetorical scholars interested in political rhetoric in general, as it is relevant for analysis of the entire political spectra, not merely its periphery. The article consists of three parts: First, a review of the literatu-re on populism; Second, a presentation of Laclau’s theory of populism; Third, an example analysis of a liberal-populist movement in Sweden during the 1970’s and 1980’s.
Keywords populism, Ernesto Laclau, antagonism, empty signifier, chains of equivalence, affect, political rhetoric.
References
Aristoteles. (1993). Den nikomachiska etiken. Göteborg: Daidalos.
Biesecker, B. (1989). Rethinking the Rhetorical Situation from within the Thematic of Difference. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 22, 110–130.
Boréus, K. (1994). Högervåg: Nyliberalism och kampen om språket i svensk debatt 1969-1989 (Diss.). Stockholm: Stockholm univ.
Bäck, M., & Möller, T. (2003). Partier och organisationer (6 uppl.). Stockholm: Nordstedts juridik.
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47, 2–16.
De Cleen, B., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2017). Distinctions and articulations: A discourse theoretical framework for the study of populism and nationalism. Javnost: The public, 24(4), 301–319.
Enos, T. (Red.). (2011). Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age. New York: Routledge.
Erlich, H. S. (1977). Populist rhetoric reassesed: A paradox. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 63, 140–151.
Eskilsson, S. (1990). Motvind, medvind: Artiklar: 1958-1989 [i urval]. Stockholm: Timbro.
Eskilsson, S. (2005). Från folkhem till nytt klassamhälle: Ett högerspöke berättar. Rimbo: Fischer & Co.
Esser, Frank, Stępińska, A., & Hopmann, D. N. (2017). Populism and the Media: Cross-National Findings and Perspectives. I T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. H. de Vreese (Red.), Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Freud, S. (1995). Valda skrifter: Bortom lustprincipen; samt Masspsykologi och jaganalys; Jaget och detet; Hämning, symtom och ångest. (2 utg). Stockholm: Natur & kultur.
Gaonkar, D., & Hariman, R. (2012). Introduction. Cultural Studies, 26(2–3), 183–184.
Habermas, J. (1985). Remarks on the Concept of Communicative Action. I G. Seebass & R. Tuomela (Red.), Social Action (s. 151–178). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5263-8_11
Hakelius, J. (2020). Hakelius: Sture Eskilsson var blygsam, men han förändrade Sverige. Fokus. Hämtad från https://www.fokus.se/2020/02/hakelius-sture-eskilsson-var-blygsam-men-han-forandrade-sverige/
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (2019). The Global State of Democracy 2019: Addressing the Ills, Reviving the Promise (s. 272). Strömsborg, Stockholm. Hämtad från https://doi.org/10.31752/idea.2019.31
Ionescu, G., & Gellner, E. (1969). Populism: Its meaning and national characteristics. New York: Macmillian.
Ivarsflaten, E., Bjånesøy Lund, L., & Blinder, S. (2019). How and Why the Populist Radical Right Persuades Citizens. I L. Suhay & Trechsel (Red.), Oxford Handbook on Political Persuasion. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Jasinski, J. (2001). Sourcebook on Rhetoric: Key concepts in contemporary rhetorical studies. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.
Johansson, L. A. (2016). Den marknadsliberala opinionsbildningens gudfader är död. Svensk tidsskrift. Hämtad från https://www.svensktidskrift.se/den-marknadsliberala-opinionsbildningens-gudfader-ar-dod
Johansson, L. A. (2018). Mittenpopulismens reträtt. Timbro. Hämtad från https://timbro.se/smedjan/mittenpopulismens-retratt/
Jungar, A.-C., & Jupskås Ravik, A. (2014). Populist Radical Right Parties in the Nordic Region: A New and Distinct Party Family? Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(3), 215–238.
Kaplan, M. (2010). The Rhetoric of Hegemony: Laclau, Radical Democracy, and the Rule of Tropes. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 43, 253–283.
Kazin, M. (2017). The Populist Persuasion: An American History. New York: Cornell University Press.
Krämer, B. (2014). Media Populism: A conceptual Clarification and Some Theses on its Effects. Communication Theory, 24, 42–60.
Laclau, E. (1990). New reflections on the revolution of our time. London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2004). Glimpsing the future. I O. Marchart & S. Critchley (Red.), Laclau—A critical reader. London ; New York: Routledge.
Laclau, E. (2005). Populism: What´s in a name? I F. Panizza (Red.), Populism and the mirror of democracy. London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (2007). On populist reason. London: Verso.
Laclau, E. (Red.). (2014). Rhetorical foundations of society. London: Verso.
Lefort, C. (1988). Democracy and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
Moffitt, B. (2016). The global rise of populism: Performance, political style, and representation. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political style. Political Studies, 62, 381–397.
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. London: Verso.
Mudde, C. (2017). Populism: An Ideational Approach. I C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Red.), Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Müller, J.-W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Oja, S. (2015). Sverigedemokraternas budskap 2005-2010: En retorisk studie av ett annorlunda parti. Örebro: Örebro univ.
Ostiguy, P. (2017). Populism: A Socio-Cultural Approach. I The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Payne, D. (2015). Ernesto Laclau och Chantal Mouffe. I S. Jonsson (Red.), Samtida politisk teori. Stockholm: Tankekraft.
Reinemann, C., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Strömbäck, J., & H. de Vreese, C. (2017). Populist Political Communication: Toward a Model of Its Causes, Forms, and Effects. I T. Aalberg, Esser, Frank, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. H. de Vreese (Red.), Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Reiter, G. I. (2019). Defining populist rhetoric: An investigation of Donald Trumps electoral campaign 2016. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 79, 78–93.
Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., & Ostiguy, P. (2017). Populism: An overview of the concept and the state of the art. I C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Red.), The oxford handbook of populism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Sloane, T. O. (2005). Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford Univ. press.
Stavrakakis, Y. (2004). Antinomies of formalism: Laclau’s theory of populism and the lessons from religious populism in Greece. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356931042000263519
Taggart, P. (2000). Populism. Buckingham: Open Univ. Press.
Weyland, K. (2017). Populism: A Political-Strategic Approach. I The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Young, A. (2018). Rhetorics of Fear and Loathing: Donald Trump’s Populist Style. I R. Skinnell (Red.), Faking the news: What rhetoric can teach us about Donald J. Trump. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
