Manifestet som transformativ proces
En undersøgelse af manifestets relation til retorisk handlekraft
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v30i92.484Nyckelord:
manifester, manifestproces, retorisk handlekraft, potentiale for handlekraft, affektive eksperimenterAbstract
Denne artikel nuancerer dominerende forståelser af manifestet og af retorisk handlekraft ved at argumentere for, at begge dele kan forstås og undersøges som en proces. Artiklen tager afsæt i traditionel og nyere feministisk manifestteori samt i forståelsen af retorisk handlekraft som både potentiale og realisering, og som noget vi tilskriver hinanden. Ideerne om manifestet og retorisk handlekraft som processuelle ligger allerede implicit i begge fagfelter, men artiklen samler, ekspliciterer og eksemplificerer disse ideer gennem et forsknings- og undervisningseksperiment kaldet Manifestet som Proces. Artiklens empiri består af seksten logbøger fra et hold kandidatstuderende i retorik, som deltog i eksperimentet. Gennem en læsning af logbøgerne viser artiklen, hvordan retorisk handlekraft i manifestprocesserne opstår som et samspil mellem person(er) og proces(er), og den finder og beskriver tre typer af retorisk handlekraft: processuel, personlig og social. Manifestet rummer dermed et potentiale for både personlig og social transformation for dem, som deltager i manifestprocessen.
Referenser
Abastado, C. (1980). Introduction à l’analyse des manifestes. Littérature (Paris. 1971), 39(3), 3–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/litt.1980.2133
Ahmed, S. (2017). Living a feminist life. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373377
Ahmed, S. (2018). Killjoy manifest. Informations Forlag.
Ariel, N. (2021). Language games with ‘manifesto’. Culture, Theory and Critique, 63(2–3), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2021.1984970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2021.1984970
Campbell, K. K. (2005). Agency: Promiscuous and protean. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000332134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1479142042000332134
Chrysagis, E., & Kompatsiaris, P. (2023). Introduction: Manifestos of the contemporary. Culture, Theory and Critique. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2023.2247192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2023.2247192
Fahs, B. (2018). Words on fire. Radical pedagogies of the feminist manifesto. I B. Fahs, A. Mann, E. Swank, & S. Stage (Red.), Transforming Contagion: Risky Contacts among Bodies, Disciplines, and Nations (s. 218–232). Rutgers University Press. https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813589626-015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813589626-015
Fahs, B. (2019). Writing with blood: The transformative pedagogy of teaching students to write manifestos. Radical Teacher, (115), 33–38. Education Research Complete. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=140081348&site=ehost-live DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/rt.2019.639
Foss, S. K., Waters, W. J. C., & Armada, B. J. (2007). Toward a theory of agentic orientation: Rhetoric and agency in Run Lola run. Communication theory, 17(3), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00293.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00293.x
Geisler, C. (2004). How ought we to understand the concept of rhetorical agency? Report from the ARS. Rhetoric Society quarterly, 34(3), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940409391286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940409391286
Gries, L. (2012). Agential matters: Tumbleweed, women-pens, citizens-hope, and rhetorical actancy (S. Dobrin, Red.; 1. udg., s. 67–91). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203134696-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203134696-5
Gunn, J., & Cloud, D. L. (2010). Agentic orientation as magical voluntarism. Communication theory, 20(1), 50–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01349.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2009.01349.x
Hanna, J. (2019). The manifesto handbook: 95 theses on an incendiary form. Zero Books.
Hoff‐Clausen, E. (2018). Rhetorical agency. What enables and restrains the power of speech? (s. 287–299). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119265771.ch20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119265771.ch20
Hoff-Clausen, E., Isager, C., & Villadsen, L. S. (2005). Retorisk agency: Hvad skaber retorikken? Rhetorica Scandinavica. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52610/HRGA7785
Houghton, R., & O’Donoghue, A. (2023). Introduction to special issue: Feminist manifestos and global constitutionalism. Global Constitutionalism, 12(3), 403–411. Cambridge Core. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381723000217 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381723000217
Junker, C. (2023). Claiming class: The manifesto between categorical disruption and stabilisation. Culture, Theory and Critique, 63(2–3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2023.2214860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2023.2214860
Just, S. N. (2025). Retorisk handlekraft—Nordisk Retorikkleksikon. I Nordsik Retorikkleksikon. Nordisk Retorikkforening. https://retorikkleksikon.no/retorisk-handlekraft/
Just, S. N., & Christiansen, T. J. (2012). Doing diversity: Text–audience agency and rhetorical alternatives. Communication Theory, 22(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01407.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2012.01407.x
Knudsen, B. T., Krogh, M., & Stage, C. (2022). Introduction: Methodologies of affective experimentation (B. T. Knudsen, M. Krogh, & C. Stage, Red.; s. 1–24) i Methodologies of affective experimentation. Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96272-2_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96272-2_1
Lundberg, C., & Gunn, I. (2005). “Ouija board, are there any communications?” Agency, ontotheology, and the death of the humanist subject, or, continuing the ARS conversation. Rhetoric Society quarterly, 35(4), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940509391323
Lyon, J. (2018). Manifestoes: Provocations of the modern. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501728358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501728358
Matthiesen, C. (2013). Elevstyret imitatio. En retorisk skrivepædagogik i teori og praksis [PhD-thesis]. University of Copenhagen.
Matthiesen, C. (2017). Poetic signs of third place: A case study of student-driven imitation in a shelter for young homeless people in Copenhagen. Best of the Journal of Rhetoric and Composition 2015-2016, 61–83.
Miller, C. R. (2007). What can automation tell us about agency? Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(2), 137–157. JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40232521 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940601021197
Moon, J. A. (1999). Learning through reflection—The use of learning journals. I Reflection in Learning and Professional Development (1. udg., s. 186–202). Routledge. https://doi-org.ez.statsbiblioteket.dk/10.4324/9780203822296-19
Moser, K. S. (2022). Køn utopi! En retorisk undersøgelse af det feministiske kønsmanifest som drivkraft for seksuel dannelse på de danske højskoler [Kandidatspeciale]. Aarhus Universitet.
Moser, K. S. (2025a). Luderen, akademikeren og manifestet: En retorisk analyse af genreeksperimenter og talepositioner i to nyere danske manifester. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning, 37(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v37i2.143478 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v37i2.143478
Moser, K. S. (2025b, januar 22). Introbrev_Manifestet som proces [Undervisningsbeskrivelse].
Puchner, M. (2005). Poetry of the revolution: Marx, manifestos, and the avant-gardes (Course Book). Princeton University Press,. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400844128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400844128
Rand, E. J. (2008). An inflammatory fag and a queer form: Larry Kramer, polemics, and rhetorical agency. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 94(3), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630802210377 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630802210377
Ratcliffe, K., & Jensen, K. (2022). Rhetorical listening in action: A concept-tactic approach. Parlor Press.
Somigli, L. (2003). Legitimizing the artist. Manifesto writing and European modernism 1885-1915. University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442621060 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442621060
Weiss, P. A., & Brueske, M. (Red.). (2018). Feminist manifestos: A global documentary reader. NYU Press. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvf3w44b DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvf3w44b
Winkiel, L. (2008). Modernism, race and manifestos. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481468
Yanoshevsky, G. (2009). Three decades of writing on manifesto: The making of a genre. Poetics today, 30(2), 257–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-2008-010
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2026 Rhetorica Scandinavica
Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
