Rhetorical Figures and Style as Argumentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v12i45.185Keywords:
rhetorical figures, metaphors, style, argumentation, rhetorical criticismAbstract
The theory of rhetorical figures played an important part in certain periods of the history of rhetoric, but lately it has not been of particular interest to rhetorical criticism. Metaphors and rhetorical figures have been the object of literary studies. The modern rhetorical criticism has treated rhetorical figures as subordinate to argumentation. The article presents a recent rhetorical theory with a primary focus on rhetorical figures as well as on argumentation. This rhetorical theory is compared with parallel perspectives of modern theories on metaphors and the analytical perspectives are explored in a reading of a debate between the rapper Niarn and the author Hanne-Vibeke Holst.
References
Aristoteles. Poetikken. Oversat og udgivet af Niels Henningsen. København, Det lille forlag, 2004.
Aristoteles. Retorik. Oversat af Thure Hastrup. København, Museum Tusculanums forlag, 1991.
Barthes, Roland. ”Den gamle retorik”, i: K&K nr. 2/1997, side 21-87. [1970] DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/kok.v25i84.21373
Black, Max. Models and Metaphors. Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1972 [1962].
Black, Max. ”More about Metaphor”, i: Ortony, Andrew (red.): Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.004
Eide, Tormod. Retorisk leksikon. Oslo, Spartacus forlag, 1999.
Fahnestock, Jeanne. Rhetorical Figures in Science. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002 [1999].
Genette, Gérard. ”Den begrænsede retorik”, i: Rhetorica Scandinavica nr. 7/ 1998, side 8-19. [1970]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52610/DDLR9445
Holst, Hanne-Vibeke. ”Du er fucking sexistisk, Niarn!”, i: Politiken d. 13.11. 2004.
Ivie, Robert L. ”Metaphor and the Rhetorical Invention of Cold War ’Idealists”, i: Burgchardt, Carl R. (red.): Readings in Rhetorical Criticism. Pennsylvania, Strata Publishing Company, 1995. [1987]
Jokeren. Gigolo Jesus. Flamingo Records, 2005.
Jørgensen, Charlotte. ”Debattens væsen og uvæsen. Om fjendtlighed i den offentlige debat”, i: Retorik Studier nr. 10/1995, side 3-43.
Jørgensen, Steffen. ”Metaforen som interaktion. I.A. Richards, M. Black, Lakoff & Johnson”, i: K&K nr. 78/1994, side 15-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/kok.v22i78.20729
Lakoff, George. ”The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”, i: Ortony, Andrew (red.): Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
Lakoff, George og Johnson, Mark. Hverdagens metaforer. København, Gyldendal, 1994. [1980]
Lakoff, George og Turner, Mark. More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
Osborn, Michael. “Archetypal Metaphor in Rhetoric: The Light-Dark Family”, i: Burgchardt, Carl R. (red.): Readings in Rhetorical Criticism. Pennsylvania, Strata Publishing Company, 1995. [1967]
Perelman, Chaim og Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.
Reboul, Olivier. ”The figure and the Argument”, i: Meyer, Michel (red.): From Metaphysics to Rhetoric. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2593-9_12
Ricoeur, Paul. Fortolkningsteori. København, Vinten, 1979.
Richards, I.A. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London, Oxford University Press, 1936.
Skyum-Nielsen, Rune. Nr. 1. Dansk hiphopkultur siden 1983. København, Informations forlag, 2006.
Quintilianus, Marcus Fabius. Ausbildung des Redners 1-2. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1988.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rhetorica Scandinavica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
