Crisis communication - but from whom to whom? Apologia, politics, and editorial framing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v12i46.182Keywords:
crisis communication, apologia, kategoria, political communication, paratext, framing, FörsäkringskassanAbstract
In March 2007, the Director General and the Chairman of the Board of the Swedish Social Insurance (Försäkringskassan) published an article on the debate pages of the largest Swedish newspaper, Dagens Nyheter. In the paratext, the authors admit that the Social Insurance has not been able to offer the citizens an effective service. This raises expectations in the reader of som kind of apology and explanation, but in the article proper, the expectations of an apologia are not met. An analysis of the article using the theories developed within rhetorical crisis communication reveals contraditory goals of the paratext and the main text. The editorial framing by Dagens Nyheter works towards presenting the article as an apologia towards the Swedish general public, while the article itself is, in fact, an act of political communication with politicians as the intended public.
References
Ad Herennium. De ratione dicendi ad C. Herennium. Åstorp: Retorikförlaget, 2005.
Benoit, W.L. Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.
Bitzer, Lloyd F. “The Rhetorical Situation”. I Philosphy and Rhetoric 1 (1968): 1-15.
Eriksson, Anders. “Om Ad Herennium”. I Rhetorica Scandinavica 34 (2005): 4.
Fisher, Walter R. “A Motive View of Communication”. I Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 56 (1970): 131-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637009382994
Friedman, Andrew L. & Samantha Miles. Stakeholders. Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199269860.001.0001
Hearit, Keith Michael. Crisis Management by Apology. Corporate Response to Allegations of Wrongdoing. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410615596
Johansen, Winni, & Finn Frandsen. Krisekommunikation. Når virksomhedens image og omdømme er truet. Köpenhamn: Samfundslitteratur, 2007.
Kroon, Åsa. Debattens dynamik. Hur budskap och betydelser förvandlas i mediedebatten. Linköping: Linköpings universitet, 2001.
Löfgren, Orvar (red.). Hej, det är från försäkringskassan! Informaliseringen av Sverige. Stockholm: Natur och kultur, 1988.
Millar, Dan P. & Robert L. Heath (red.). Responding to Crisis. A Rhetorical Approach to Crisis Communication. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609496
Ryan, Halford Ross. “Kategoria and Apologia: On their Rhetorical Criticism as a Speech Set”. I Quaterly Journal of Speech, 68 (1982): 254-261 [Artikeln finns även i: Halfors Ross Ryan (red.). American Rhetoric from Roosevelt to Reagan. Pospect Hights, Ill.: Waveland Press, 1983: 299-309.] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638209383611
Ware, B.L. & Wil A. Linkugel. “They Spoke in Defense of Themselves: On the Generic Criticism of Apologia”. I Quaterly Journal of Speech, vol. 59 (1973): 273-283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383176
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rhetorica Scandinavica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0