Narration som paradigme for menneskelig kommunikation

Om offentlig moralsk debat

Författare

  • Walter R. Fisher
  • Mark Herron
  • Esben Bjerggaard Nielsen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v17i63.453

Abstract

Dette essay fremsætter en teori om menneskelig kommunikation baseret på forestillingen om mennesket som homo narrans. Det sammenligner og kontrasterer dette syn med det traditionelle rationelle perspektiv om ­symbolsk interaktion. Brugbarheden af det narrative paradigme og dets medfølgende forståelse af fornuft og rationalitet demonstreres igennem en udvidet analyse af nøgleaspekter af den igangværende debat om atom­krig og via en kort anvendelse på Gilgamesh-eposet. Det narrative paradigme bringer to temaer i den retoriske teori sammen: det argumenterende, overbevisende tema og det litterære, æstetiske tema

Referenser

Alter, Robert. The Art of Biblical Narrative. New York: Basic books, 1981.

Apel, K.O. “Types of Rationality Today: The Continuum of Reason between Science and Ethics”, i Rationality to-day, red. T.F. Geraets, 309-339. Ottowa: University of Ottowa Press, 1979.

Aristoteles. Rhetoric, oversat af W.R. Roberts. New York: The Modern Library Press, 1954.

Baier, Annette. “Secular Faith”, i Revisions: Changing Perspectives on Moral Philosophy, red. Stanley Hauerwas & Alisdair MacIntyre, 203-221. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1983.

Bantz, Charles R. “Television News: Reality and Research”, Western Journal of Speech Communication 39 (1975), 123-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570317509373857

Barrett, William. The Illusion of Technique: A search for Meaning in Technological Civilization. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday, 1979.

Barthes, Roland. “Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narratives”, i Image-music-text, red. S. Heath, 79-124. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977.

Bateson, Gregory. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. Toronto: Bantam Books, 1979.

Benjamin, Walter. “The Storyteller”, i Illuminations, red. H. Arendt, 83-109. New York: Schocken Books, 1969.

Bennett, W. Lance. “Political Scenarios and the Nature of Politics”, Philosophy and Rhetoric 8 (1975), 23-42.

Bennett, W. Lance. “Storytelling and Criminal Trials: A Model of Social Judgment” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 64 (1978), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637809383408

Bennett, W. Lance & Martha S. Feldman. Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1981.

Bitzer, Lloyd F. “Rhetoric and Public Knowledge”, i Rhetoric, Philosophy and Literature: An Exploration, red. D. Burks, 67-93. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 1978.

Booth, Wayne C. Modern Dogma and the Rhetoric of Assent. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1974.

Bormann, Ernest G. “Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality”, Quarterly Journal of Speech 58 (1972), 396-407. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637209383138

Bormann, Ernest G. “The Eagleton Affair: A Fantasy Theme Analysis”, Quarterly Journal of Speech 59 (1973), 143-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383163

Bormann, Ernest G. “The Tentative and the Certain in Rhetoric: The Role of Corroboration on the Rigidity or Flexibility of Rhetorical Visions”, paper præsenteret ved det årlige møde i the Central States Speech Association, Minneapolis, 1979.

Bormann, Ernest G. “Fantasy Theme Analysis”, i The Rhetoric of Western Thought, red. J.L. Golden, G.F. Berquist & W.E. Coleman, 433-449. 3. Udgave. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishers, 1983.

Brockriede, Wayne. “Where is Argument?”, Journal of the American Forensics Association 11 (1975), 179-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1975.11951059

Brockriede, Wayne. “Characteristics of Arguments and Arguing”, Journal of the American Forensics Association 13 (1977), 129-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1977.11951099

Brockriede, Wayne. (1982). “Arguing about Human Understanding”. Communication Monographs, 49, 137-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758209376078

Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives. New York: George Braziller, 1955.

Burke, Kenneth. The Philosophy of Literary Form (rev. ed.). New York: Vintage Books, 1957.

Burke, Kenneth. “Definition of Man”, i Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method, Kenneth Burke, 3-24. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1968.

Burke, Kenneth. “Lecture Outline. Logology: An Overall View”, personlig korrespondance, 1983.

Burleson, B.R. “Characteristics of Argument” i Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Argumentation, red. G. Ziegelmueller & J. Rhodes, 955-979. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, (1981).

Campbell, Joseph. Myths to Live By. New York: Bantam Books, 1973.

Campbell, J.A. “On the Rhetoric of History: Epochal Discourse and Discovery of the Universal Audience”, ikke-publiceret paper, University of Washington, Department of Speech Communication, 1983.

Campbell, J.A. & J.R. Stewart “Rhetoric, Philosophy, and Conversation”, paper præsenteret ved det årlige møde i the Western Speech Communication Association, San Jose, 1981.

Cassirer, Ernst. An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1944.

Cassirer, Ernst. “The Technique of our Modern Political Myths”, i Symbol, Myth, and Culture: Essays and Lectures of Ernst Cassirer, red. D.P. Verene, 242-267. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1979.

Cox, J. Robert. “Investigating Policy Arguments as a Field”, i Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Argumentation, red. G. Ziegemueller & J. Rhodes, 126-142. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1981.

Danto, Arthur C. “Narration and Knowledge”, Philosophy and Literature 6 (1982), 17-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/phl.1982.0023

Derrida, Jacques. “The Law of Genre”, Critical Inquiry 7 (1980), 55-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448088

Dewey, John. The Public and its Problems. Chicago: Swallow Press, 1927.

Van Dijk, T.A. “Philosophy of Action and Theory of Narrative”, Poetics 5 (1976), 287-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(76)90014-0

Ehninger, Douglas. “Validity as Moral Obligation”, Southern Speech Journal 33 (1968), 215-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10417946809371937

Eliade, Mircea. Myth and Reality. New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1963.

Farrell, Thomas B. “Knowledge, Consensus, and Rhetorical Theory”, The Quarterly Journal of Speech 62 (1976), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637609383313

Farrell, Thomas B. “Validity and Rationality: The Rhetorical Constituents of Argumentative Form”, Journal of the American Forensics Association 13 (1977), 142-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1977.11951101

Farrell, Thomas B. “The Tradition of Rhetoric and the Philosophy of Communication”, Communication 7 (1983), 151-180.

Farrell, Thomas B., & Goodnight, G. Thomas. “Accidental Rhetoric: The Root Metaphor of Three Mile Island”, Communication Monographs 48 (1981), 271-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758109376063

Fisher, Walter R. “Reaffirmation and Subversion of the American Dream”, The Quarterly Journal of Speech 9 (1973), 160-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383164

Fisher, Walter R. “Toward a Logic of Good Reasons”. The Quarterly Journal of Speech 64 (1978), 376-384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637809383443

Fisher, Walter R. “Rationality and the Logic of Good Reasons”, Philosophy and Rhetoric 13 (1980), 121-130.

Fisher, Walter R. “Romantic Democracy, Ronald Reagan, and Presidential Heroes”, Western Journal of Speech Communication 46 (1982), 299-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318209374088

Fisher, Walter R., & Burnes, R.D. Armament and Disarmament: The Continuing Dispute. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 1964.

Fisher, Walter R., & Richard A. Filloy “Argument in Drama and Literature: An Exploration”, i Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, red. J. Robert Cox & C.A. Willard, 343-362. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982.

Frentz, T.S., & Farrell, T.B. “Language Action: A Paradigm for Communication,” The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 62, (1976), 333-349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637609383348

Gadamer, H.G. Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Essays on Plato, oversat af P. Christofer Smith. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980.

Gadamer, H.G. Reason in the Age of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1981.

Gadamer, H.G. Truth and Method. New York: The Crossword Publishing Company, 1982.

Gallie, Walter Bryce. Philosophy and Historical Understanding. New York: Schocken Books, 1964.

Gardner, John. On Moral Fiction. New York: Basic Books, 1978.

Goldberg, Michael. Theology and Narrative. Nashville, TN: The Parthenon Press, 1982.

Goodnight, G. Thomas. “The Liberal and Conservative Presumptions: On Political Philosophy and the Foundation of Public Argument”, i Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation, J. Rhodes & S. Newell, 304-337. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1980.

Goody, Jack & Ian Watt. “The Consequences of Literacy”, Comparative Studies in Society and History 5 (1962-1963), 304-326 og 332-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500001730

Gottlieb, G. The Logic of Choice: An Investigation of the Concepts of Rule and Rationality. New York: Macmillan, 1968.

Graff, Gerald. Literature Against Itself: Literacy Ideas in Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.

Gusfield, J.R. Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1976.

Habermas, Jürgen. Theory and Practice: The History of a Concept. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1967.

Habermas, Jürgen. Knowledge and Social Interests. Boston: Beacon Press, 1973.

Hauerwas, Stanley. A Community of Character: Toward a Constructive Christian Ethic. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.

Hausknecht, Murray. “Waiting for the End? Prospects for Nuclear Destruction”, Dissent 29 (1982), 282-284.

Hawes, Lenard C. “The Reflexivity of Communication Research”, Western Journal of Speech Communication 42 (1978), 12-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570317809373917

Heidegger, Martin. Existence and Being. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1949.

Heidegger, Martin. On Time and Being, oversat af J. Stanbaugh. New York: Harper and Row, 1972.

Heidegger, Martin. “Letter on Humanism” i Phenomenology and Existentialism, red. R. Zaner & D. Ihde, 147-181. New York: Capricorn Books, G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1981-1_10

Hollis, Martin. Models of Man: Philosophical Thoughts on Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621178

Holton, G. Thematic Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.

Hymes, Dell. “A Narrative View of the World”, i Language in Education: Ethnolinguistic Essays, red. D. Hymes, 129-138. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics, 1980.

Hynes, T.J. Jr. “Liberal and Conservative Presumptions in Public Argument: A Critique” i Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation, red. J. Rhodes & S. Newell, 338-347. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communications Association, 1980.

Jacobs, S. & Jackson, S. “Argument as a Natural Category: The Routine Grounds for Arguing in Conversation”, Western Journal of Speech Communication 45 (1981), 118-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318109374035

Jacobsen, Thorkild. The Treasures of Darkness: A History of Mesopotamian Religion. New Haven. CT: Yale University Press, 1976.

Johnstone, Henry W. Jr. Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument. University Park, PA: Dialogue Press of Man and World, 1978.

Kermode, Frank. “Secrets and Narrative Sequence”, Critical Inquiry 7 (1980), 83-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448089

Key, Valdimer Orlando. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936-1960. New York: Vintage Books, 1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674497764

Kidd, Virginia. “Happily ever after and other Relationship Styles: Advice on Interpersonal Relations in Popular Magazines, 1951-1973”, The Quarterly Journal of Speech 61 (1975), 31-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637509383266

Kirkwood, W. G. “Storytelling and Self-confrontation: Parables as Communication Strategies”, The Quarterly Journal of Speech 69 (1983), 58-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638309383635

Krashen, Stephen D. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1982.

Kuhn, Thomas S. “Second thoughts on Paradigms”, i The Structure of Scientific Theories, red. F. Suppe, 459-482. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1974.

Langer, Susanne K. Feeling and Form: A Theory of Art. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1953.

Lonergan, Bernard J.F., SJ. Insight: A Study of Human Understanding. New York: Harper and Row, 1958.

Lucaitas, John L. (1981). “Rhetoric and the Problem of Legitimacy”, i Dimensions of argument: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Argumentation, red. G. Ziegelmueller & J. Rhodes. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1981.

Lyne, John. “Discourse, Knowledge, and Social Process: Some Changing Equations”, The Quarterly Journal of Speech 68 (1982), 201-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638209383604

Masterman, Margaret. “The Nature of a Paradigm”, i Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, red. I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave, 59-89. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

McCracken, S. “The Peace of the Grave”, National Review (23. Juli, 1982), 904-905.

McGee, Michael Calvin & Martin, Martha Ann. “Public Knowledge and Ideological Argumentation”, Communication Monographs 50 (1983), 47-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758309390153

McGee, Michael Calvin, Allen Scult & J. Kenneth Kuntz. “Genesis 1-3 as Sacred Text: An Inquiry into the Relationship of Rhetoric and Power”, Upubliceret paper, The University of Iowa, Department of Communication, 1983).

McGuire, Michael. “Mythic Rhetoric in Mein Kampf: A Structural Critique”, The Quarterly Journal of Speech 68 (1977), 1 – 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637709383362

MacIntyre, Alasdair. “Rationality and the Explanation of Action”, i Against the Self-image of the Age. Essays on Ideology and Philosophy, red. A. MacIntyre, 244-259. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1978.

MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1981.

McKerrow, Ray E. “Rhetorical Validity: An Analysis of Three Perspectives on the Justification of Rhetorical Argument”, Journal of the American Forensics Association 13 (1977), 133-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1977.11951100

McKerrow, Ray E. “Argument Communities: A Quest for Distinctions”, i Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation, red. J. Rhodes & S. Newell, 214-227. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1980a.

McKerrow, Ray E. “On Fields and Rational Enterprises: A Reply to Willard”, i Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation, red. J. Rhodes & S. Newell, 401-411. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1980b.

McKerrow, Ray E. “Senses of Argument: Uses and Limitations of the Concept”, i Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Argumentation, red. G. Ziegelmuller & J. Rhodes, 980-986. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1981.

McKerrow, Ray E. “Rationality and Reasonableness in a Theory of Argument”, i Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, red. J. R. Cox & C. A. Willard, 105-122. Carbondale, IL: Southern University Press, 1982.

Medina, Angel. Reflection, Time, and The Novel: Toward a Communicative Theory of Literature. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul, 1979.

Mink, Louis O. “Narrative Form as a Cognitive Instrument”, i The Writing of History, red. R.H. Canary, 129-149. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.

Nelson, J.S. “Tropal History and the Social Sciences: Reflections on Struever’s Remarks”, History and Theory, Beiheft 19 (1980), 80-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2504891

Ochs, Donovan J., & Ronal J. Burritt. “Perceptual Theory: Narrative Suasion of Lysias”, i Explorations in Rhetorical Criticism, red. C.J. Stewart, D.J. Ochs & G.P. Mohrmann, 51-74. University Park, PA.: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1973.

Ogden, S.M. “Myth and Truth”, i The Reality of God, S.M. Ogden, 99-129. San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1977.

O’Keefe, Daniel J. “Two Concepts of Argument”, Journal of the American Forensics Association 13 (1977), 121-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1977.11951098

O’Keefe, Daniel J. “The Concepts of Argument and Arguing”, i Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, red. J.R. Cox & C.A. Willard, 3-23. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982.

Ong, Walter. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen & Co, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203328064

Perelman, Chaim, & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca. The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argument, oversat af J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1969.

Perelman, Chaim . “The Rational and the Reasonable”, i The New Rhetoric and The Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications, Chaim Perelman, 117-123. Boston: D. Reidel, 1979. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9482-9_11

Pierre, A.J. “Review of The Fate of the Earth”, Foreign Affairs 60 (1982), 1188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20041289

Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Postcritical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.

Pryor, B. “Saving the Public through Rational Discourse”, i Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Argumentation, red. G. Zeigelmuller & J. Rhodes, 848-864. Annandale, VA.: Speech Communication Association, 1981.

Ramsey, Ian Thomas. “Religion and Science: A Philosopher’s Approach”, i New Essays on Religious Language, red. D.M. High, 36-53. New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.

Randall, J.H. Jr. The Making of the Modern Mind. New York: Columbia University Press, 1976.

Rarick, David L., Mary B. Duncan, David G. Lee & Linda W. Porter. “The Carter Persona: An Empirical Analysis of the Rhetorical Vision of Campaign ’76”, The Quarterly Journal of Speech 63 (1977), 258-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637709383387

Ricoeur, Paul. Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth, TX: The Texas Christian University Press, 1976.

Ricouer, Paul. “Narrative Time”, Critical Inquiry 7 (1980), 169-190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448093

Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979).

Sandars, N.K. The Epic of Gilgamesh, New York: Penguin Books, 1982.

Schell, Jonathan. The Fate of the Earth. New York: Avon Books, 1982.

Schrag, Calvin O. Radical Reflection and the Origins of The Human Sciences. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Department of Philosophy, 1980.

Schrag, Calvin O. “Rhetoric, Hermeneutics and Communication”, ikke-publiceret manuscript, Purdue University. Department of Philosophy, 1984.

Scott, R.L. “Evidence in Communication: We are such Stuff”, Western Journal of Speech Communication 42 (1978), 29-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570317809373919

Scult, Allen. “The Rhetorical Character of the Old Testament and its Interpretation”, paper givet ved møde for det International Society for the History of Rhetoric, Florence, Italien, 1983.

Sennett, Richard. The Fall of Public Man: On the Social Psychology of Capitalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1978.

Sillars. Malcolm O., & Patricia Ganer. “Values and Beliefs: A Systematic Basis for Argumentation”, i Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, red. J.R. Cox & C.A. Willard, 184-201. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982.

Simons, Herbert C. “In Praise of Muddleheaded Anecdotalism”, Western Journal of Speech Communication 42 (1978), 21-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10570317809373918

Todorov, Tzvetan. The Poetics of Prose (oversættelse af R. Howard). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977.

Toulmin, Stephen E. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.

Toulmin, Stephen E. “Reasons and Causes”, i Explanation in the Behavioral Sciences, red. R. Borger & F. Cioffi, 1-41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

Toulmin, Stephen E. Human Understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1972.

Toulmin, Stephen E. The Return to Cosmology: Postmodern Science and the Theology of Nature. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520311817

Toulmin, Stephen E., Richard Reike & Allan Janik. Introduction to Reasoning. New York: MacMillan, 1979.

Turner, Victor. “Social Dramas and Stories about them”, Critical inquiry 7 (1980), 141-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448092

Voegelin, Eric. The New Science of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952.

Voegelin, Eric. From Enlightenment to Revolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1975.

Wallace, Karl. “The Substance of Rhetoric: Good Reasons”, The Quarterly Journal of Speech 49 (1963), 239-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636309382611

Wenzel, Joseph W. “Toward a Rationale for Value-centered Argument”, Journal of the American Forensics Association 13 (1977), 150-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1977.11951102

Wenzel, Joseph W. “Perspectives on Argument”, i Proceedings of the Summer Conference on Argumentation, red. J. Rhodes & S. Newell, 112-133. Falls Church, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1980.

Wieseltier, Leon. “The Great Nuclear Debate”, The New Republic (10. og 17. januar, 1983), 7-38.

Willard, C.A. “A Reformulation of the Concept of Argument: The Constructivist/Interactionist Foundations of a Sociology of Argument”, Journal of the American Forensics Association 14 (1978), 121-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.1978.11951121

Willard, Charles Arthur. “Argument Fields”, i Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research, red. J.R. Cox & C.A. Willard, 24-77. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982.

White, Hayden. Metahistory; Tropics of History. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, 1978.

White, Hayden. “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality”, Critical Inquiry 7 (1980), 5-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/448086

Zarefsky, David. “Reasonableness in Public Policy Argument: Fields as Institutions”, i Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Argumentation, red. G. Ziegelmueller & J. Rhodes, 88-100. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1981.

Ziegelmueller, George & Jack Rhodes (red.). Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Argumentation. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association, 1981.

Ziman, John. Public Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, 1968.

##submission.downloads##

Publicerad

2025-12-16

Referera så här

Fisher, W. R., Herron, M., & Bjerggaard Nielsen, E. . (2025). Narration som paradigme for menneskelig kommunikation: Om offentlig moralsk debat. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 17(63). https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v17i63.453