Sagt i situationen

Forslag til retorisk kritik af ytringer i den offentlige sfære

Författare

  • Sine Just Handelshøjskolen i København

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v6i24.253

Abstract

Hvordan kan det samfundsvidenskabelige offentlighedsbegreb inddrages i retorisk kritik af konkrete ytringer, og hvilket forklaringspotentiale har en sådan inddragelse? Disse spørgsmål søges besvaret gennem en opstilling af en tredelt situationel analyse. Eksisterende begrebsdannelser om den retoriske og den hermeneutiske situation suppleres med begrebet ’en sociologisk situation’ der opstilles på baggrund af en sammenlignende læsning af Jürgen Habermas’ og Zygmunt Baumans offentlighedsteorier, og der gives et eksempel på den tredelte analysemodels anvendelighed.

Författarbiografi

Sine Just, Handelshøjskolen i København

Sine Just er cand. mag. i retorik og ph.d.-studerende ved Handelshøjskolen i København med et projekt om den offentlige debat om EU’s fremtid.

Referenser

Aristoteles (1996): Retorik. Oversat af Thure Hastrup. Museum Tusculanums Forlag, København.

Bakhtin. M. M. (1986): Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Oversat af Vern V. McGee. University of Texas Press, Austin. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/720466

Bauman, Zygmunt (1998): Globalization. The Human Consequences. Polity Press, Cambridge UK.

– (1999): In Search of Politics. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.

– (2000); Liquid Modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.

– (2001): The Individualized Society. Polity Press, UK.

Beer, Francis A. & Robert Hariman (1996): Post-Realism. The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan.

Bitzer, Lloyd F. (1968/1997): ”Den retoriske situation.” Oversat af Jens E. Kjeldsen. Rhetorica Scandinavica, nr. 3, s. 9-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52610/TUEZ5635

Burke, Kenneth (1969): A Rhetoric of Motives. University of California Press, Berkeley, California. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520353237

Calhoun, Craig (red.) (1992): Habermas and the Public Sphere. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Clifford, James og George E. Marcus (red.) (1986): Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

Farrell, Thomas B. & G. Thomas Goodnight (1981): ”Accidental Rhetoric: The Root Metaphors of Three Mile Island.” I Communication Monographs, vol. 48, s. 271-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758109376063

– (1993): Norms of Rhetorical Culture. Yale University Press, New Haven.

– (red.) (1998): Landmark Essays on Contemporary Rhetoric. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, New Jersey.

Fischer, Joschka (2000): ”Vom Staatenverbund zur Föderation – Gedanken über die Finalität der europäischen Integration.” www.bundesregierung.de/frameset/index.jsp

Fraser, Nancy (1992): ”Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” I Calhoun, Craig (red.): Habermas and the Public Sphere. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, s. 109-142.

Freedman, Aviva & Peter Medway (red.) (1994): Genre and the New Rhetoric. Taylor & Francis, London.

Goodnight, G. Thomas & David B. Hingstman (1997): ”Studies in the Public Sphere.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 83, s. 351-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639709384190

Gring-Pemple, Lisa M. (1998): ”Writing Themselves into Consciousness: Creating a Bridge Between Public and Private Spheres.” I Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 84, s. 41-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639809384203

Gross, Alan G. og William M. Keith (red.) (1997): Rhetorical Hermeneutics. Invention and Interpretation in the Age of Science. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.

Habermas, Jürgen (1962/1990): Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main.

– (1981/1996): Teorien om den kommunikative handlen. Oversat af John Cederstrøm. Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Aalborg.

– (1992): ”Further Reflections on the Public Sphere.” I Calhoun, Craig (red.): Habermas and the Public Sphere. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, s. 421-461.

– (1998): On the Pragmatics of Communication. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

– (1998a): The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

– (2001): ”Why Europe Needs a Constitution.” I New Left Review, 11.

Hernadi, Paul (red.) (1989): The Rhetoric of Interpretation and the Interpretation of Rhetoric. Duke University Press, Durham.

Hyde, Michael J. & Craig R. Smith (1979/1998): ”Hermeneutics and Rhetoric: A Seen But Unobserved Relationship.” I Farrell, Thomas B. (red.): Landmark Essays on Contemporary Rhetoric. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, New Jersey, s. 65-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637909383487

Miller, Carolyn R. (1984/2001): ”Genre som sosial handling.” Oversat af Kjell Lars Berge. Rhetorica Scandinavica, nr, 18, s. 19-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52610/CWKE3326

– (1994): ”Rhetorical Community: The Cultural Basis of Genre.” I Freedman, Aviva & Peter Medway (red.): Genre and the New Rhetoric. Taylor & Francis, London, s. 67-77.

Moe, Sverre (1999): ”Luhmann og opplysningens retorik.” I Rhetorica Scandinavica, nr. 10, s. 20-31.

Olson, Kathryn M. & G. Thomas Goodnight (1994): ”Entanglements of Consumption, Cruelty, Privacy and Fashion: The Social Controversy over Fur.” I Quarterly Journal of Speech, vol. 80, s. 249-276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639409384072

Perelman, Chaim & Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca (1970): Traité de l’argumentation. La nouvelle rhétorique. 4. udgave. Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles, Bruxelles.

Perelman, Chaim (1979): The New Rhetoric and the Humanities. Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland.

Rosteck, Thomas (red.) (1999): At the Intersection. Cultural Studies and Rhetorical Studies. The Guilford Press, New York.

Splichal, Slavko (1999): Public Opinion. Developments and Controversies in the Twentieth Century. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham, Maryland.

Vatz, Richard E. (1973/2000): ”Myten om den retoriske situation.” Oversat af Jonas Gabrielsen & Christina Pontoppidan. Rhetorica Scandinavica, nr. 15, s. 7-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52610/MWVM5196

##submission.downloads##

Publicerad

2025-12-16

Referera så här

Just, S. (2025). Sagt i situationen: Forslag til retorisk kritik af ytringer i den offentlige sfære. Rhetorica Scandinavica, 6(24), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v6i24.253