Også respektabel? Retoriske konstruk - tioner af fleksible (u)frugtbare kroppe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52610/rhs.v14i56.147Nyckelord:
Feminist rhetorical theory, surrogacy, new reproductive technologies, cross-border reproductive careAbstract
Kroppe og kropsdele udveksles i stadig højere grad mellem den første og den tredje verden. Et relativt nyt og stadig mere udbredt fænomen er, at fertilitetsrejsende krydser grænser for at gøre brug af rugemødre – bl.a. i Indien. Når en indisk kvinde udlejer sin livmoder kommercielt og giver liv til et barn som hun ikke er beslægtet med i genetisk forstand, med henblik på at eksportere det til en familie i en anden del af verden, udfordres traditionelle forestillinger om slægtskab og familiedannelse, og det er derfor en overskridende kropslig og kulturel praksis i mere end en forstand. Artiklen undersøger hvordan respektabilitet etableres for henholdsvis fertilitetsrejsende og rugemoderen og argumenterer for, hvordan den komplekse problematik kan begribeliggøres ved hjælp af en feministisk retorisk analyse.
Referenser
Abrahamsen, Katrine J. ”Livmoder til Leje”, i: Information http://www.information.dk/163798. (downloaded 2010-06-20).
Adrian, Stine W. Nye skabelsesberetninger om æg, sæd og embryoner: et etnografisk studie af skabelser på sædbanker og fertilitetsklinikker. LiU-Tryck, Linkoping, 2006.
Butler, Judith. Excitable Speech. The Politics of the Performative. Routledge, New York, 1997.
Condit, Celeste. “In Praise of Eloquent Diversity: Gender and Rhetoric as Public Persuasion”, i: Women’s Studies in Communication 20 nr. 3 (1997), side 91-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.1997.10162405
European Society of Reproduction and Embryology. “Cross-border reproductive care in six European countries”, http://www.eshre.eu/01/MyDocuments/Shenfield_et_al_2010-_Cross_border_reproductive_care_in_six_European_countries.pdf (downloaded 2010-05-05).
Flathseth, Merethe. Førende forestillinger i Fosterpolitikken. En metafor- og diskursanalyse av abort og fosterdiagnostikk. Universitetet i Bergen, Bergen, 2009.
Foss, Karen A., Foss, Sonja K., Griffin, Cindy L. Feminist Rhetorical Theories. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1999.
Franklin, Sarah and Ragoné, Helena. Reproducing Reproduction. Kinship Power and Technological Innovation. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1998.
Frydenlund Larsen, Bolette. ”På vej til at blive mor og far – køn, klasse, etnicitet og race i Jordemoderkonsultationer”, i: Kvinder, køn og forskning 1 (2010), side 18-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v0i1.28022
Gearhart, Sally Miller. “The Womanization of Rhetoric”, i: Womens Studies International Quarterly, nr. 2 (1979), side 195-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(79)91809-8
Ginsburg, Faye D. & Rapp, Rayna. Conceiving the New World Order. The Global Politics of Reproduction. University of California Press, Berkeley: 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520915442
Haraway, Donna. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s”, Socialist Review 80 (1985), side 65-108.
Haraway, Donna J. When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 2008.
http://www.ivfcharotar.com/ (downloaded 2009-12-05).
http://in.cryosinternational.com/home.aspx (downloaded 2009-12-05).
http://www.drmalpani.com/ (downloaded 2009-12-05).
http://surrogacyindia.com/ (downloaded 2009-12-05).
Inhorn, Marcia. Quest for Conception: Gender, Infertility, and Egyptian Medical Traditions. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1994.
Jean Moore, Lisa. Sperm Counts. Overcome by Man’s Most Precious Fluid. New York University Press, New York, 2007.
Kohrs Campbell, Karlyn. ”The rhetoric of women’s liberation: An oxymoron”, i: The Quarterly Journal of Speech 59 (1973), side 74-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383155
Kroløkke, Charlotte & Foss, Karen A. ’Sørg hellere for en solid tremmeseng.’ Feministiske udfordringer til retorikken, i: Rhetorica Scandinavia 42 (2007), side 5-19.
Kroløkke, Charlotte. ”Click a dad: commercial masculinity on the line”, i: Journal of Consumer Culture 9 nr. 1 (2009), side 7-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540508099701
Kroløkke, Charlotte & Madsen, Karen Hvidtfeldt. ”’Build-A-Baby’ i Indien”, i: Webmagasinet Forum. http://www.kvinfo.dk/side/559/article/957/ (downloaded 2010-06-29)
Kvist, Gitte. ”Århus tiltrækker fertilitetsturister.”, i: P4 Østjylland. http://www.dr.dk/Regioner/ Aarhus/Nyheder/AarhusBy/2009/07/27/061621.htm®ional (downloaded 2010-05-28).
Mamo, Laura. Queering reproduction: Achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience. Duke University Press, Durham, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822390220
Markens, Susan. Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction. University of California Press, Berkeley, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520940970
Martin, Emily “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based On Stereotypical Male-Female Roles”, i: Signs: Journal of Women, Culture and Society 16 nr. 3 (1991), side 485-501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/494680
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade; Russo, Ann & Torres, Lourdes. Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Indiana University Press, Indiana, 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/3150.0
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. Feminism without Borders. Duke University Press, NC, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822384649
Mral, Brigitte. “Motståndens retorik. Om kvinnors argumentative strategier”, i: Rhetorica Scandinavica 27 (2003), side 34-50.
Ragoné, Helena. Surrogate Motherhood. Conception in the Heart. Westview Press Inc, Boulder, 1994.
Raymond, Janice G. Women as Wombs. Reproductive Technologies and the Battle over Women’s Freedom. HarperSanFrancisco, New York, 1993.
Roberts, Elisabeth F.S. ”The Traffic Between Women: Female Alliance and Familial Egg Donation in Ecuador”, i: Birenbaum-Carmeli & Inhorn (red). Assisting Reproduction, Testing
Genes. Global Encounters with New Biotechnologies, s 113-143, New York Berghahn Books, 2009.
Rothman, Barbara K. Recreating Motherhood: Ideology and Technology in a Patriarchal Society. W.W. Norton, New York, 1989.
Sandelowski, Margarete & de Lacey, Sheryl. “The Uses of a “Disease”: Infertility as Rhetorical Vehicle”, i Inhorn & Balen (red).Infertility around the Globe. New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and New Reproductive Technologies, s 33-51, Berkley: University of California Press, 2002.
Skeggs, Beverly. Formations of Class and Gender. Becoming Respectable. Sage Publitions, Thousand Oaks, 1997.
Skeggs, Berverley. “Uneasy Alignments, Resourcing Respectable Subjectivity”, i: GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 10 (2004), side 291-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-10-2-291
Skeggs, Beverley. ”Respectability” (2006). http://www9.umu.se/medfak/cgf/Respectability-%202%20_3_.pdf (downloaded 2010-05).
Spar, Deborah L. The Baby Business. How Money, Science, and Politics Drive the Commerce of Conception. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 2006.
Storrow, Richard F. “Quests for Conception: Fertility Tourists, Globalization and Feminist Legal Theory”, i: Hastings Law Journal, (2005), side 295-330.
Thompson, Charis. Making Parents. The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005.
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2023 Rhetorica Scandinavica
Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0
