Misforståelser der virker
Deepfakes, hoaxes og metanoisk retorik
Nyckelord:
Metanoia, Narrativ Retorik, Hoax, Fiktion, DeepfakeAbstract
Denne artikel stiller skarpt på en bestemt form for retorik, som via eksperimenter med fiktionalisering bruger misforståelser strategisk. Det overordnede argument er, at sådanne eksperimenter skaber en særlig form for refleksivitet, som kan betegnes som metanoisk. Teoretisk indskriver artiklen sig i dialog med nyere fiktionsteori og med aktuelle revitaliseringer af metanoiabegrebet. Artiklen læser to cases, som begge iscenesætter misforståelser derved, at de først inviterer publikum til at opfatte dem som faktuelle for så derefter at afsløre, at de er fiktionaliserede. De to cases er hentet fra to diskurstyper, som ideerne om eksperimenterende fiktionalitet og metanoisk refleksivitet giver yderligere forståelse af, nemlig hoaxes og deepfakes. Artiklen udvider og skærper opfattelsen af, hvad metanoiske processer er, og hvordan de fungerer, samt giver et præcist sæt af begreber til at tale om, hvordan eksperimenter med fiktionalisering i aktuel, nyskabende retorik virker.
Referenser
Andersen, Rikke Kraglund, Louise Brix Jacobsen og Henrik Skov Nielsen (red.). (2019). Satirisk fake news. Forlaget Spring.
Aristoteles. (2007). Retorik. Viborg: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.
Benjamin N. Jacobsen og Jill Simpson. (2023): “The tensions of deepfakes”, Information, Communication & Society, 1-15. DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2023.2234980
BETC. (2016). “Like my Addiction”. https://betc.com/en/society/louise-hits-the-bottle-and-the-world-hits-like (sidst besøgt december 2023).
boyd, danah. (2011). “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” I: Z Papacharissi (red.), A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, 39–58. DOI: 10.4324/9780203876527-8
Butts, Jimmy. (2023). Strangely Rhetorical: Composing Differently with Novelty Devices
Chicago, IL: CDC Presses. DOI: 10.7330/9781646422821
Chesney, R., og Citron, D. (2019). “Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security.” California Law Review 107, 1755–1820. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3213954
De Vries, K. (2020). “You never fake alone: Creative AI in action.” Information, Communication & Society, 23:14, 2110–2127. DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2020.1754877
Ellwanger, Adam. (2020). Metanoia. Rhetoric, Authenticity, and the Transformation of the Self. Penn State UP, Kindle Edition. DOI: 10.5325/j.ctv14gph1m
Fedler, Fred. (1989). Media Hoaxes. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Finlayson, Alan. (2022). “YouTube and Political Ideologies: Technology, Populism and Rhetorical Form.” Political Studies, 70:1: 62–80. DOI: 10.1177/0032321720934630
Fludernik, Monika og Henrik Zetterberg-Nielsen (red.). (2020). Travelling Concepts: New Fictionality Studies. Berlin: Peter Lang. DOI: 10.3726/b17154
Gammelgaard, Lasse R., Stefan Iversen, Louise Brix Jacobsen, James Phelan, Richard Walsh, Henrik Zetterberg-Nielsen og Simona Zetterberg-Nielsen (red.). (2022). Fictionality in Literature: Core Concepts Revisited, Ohio State University Press. DOI: 10.26818/9780814215012
Gjerlevsen, Simona Zetterberg. (2018). Fiktion. Serien Tænkepauser – viden til hverdagen. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Gjerlevsen, Simona Zetterberg og Henrik Skov Nielsen. (2020). “Distinguishing Fictionality.” I: Maagaard et al. (red.) Exploring Fictionality: Conceptions, Test Cases, Discussions, Southern Denmark UP, 19-41.
Gray, Jonathan. (2010). Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers, and other Media Paratexts. New York: New York University Press. DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9780814733158.001.0001
Habgood-Coote, Joshua. (2023). “Deepfakes and the Epistemic Apocalypse.” Synthese 201:103, 1-23. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-023-04097-3
Hight, Craig og Jane Roscoe. (2006). “Forgotten Silver: A New Zealand Television Hoax and Its Audience.” I Juhasz og Lerner (red.) F Is for Phony: Fake Documentary and Truths Undoing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 171-186. DOI: 10.5040/9780755698707.0058
Iversen, Stefan og Henrik Skov Nielsen. (2016). “The Politics of Fictionality in Documentary form: The Act of Killing and The Ambassador”, European Journal of English Studies 3, 249-262. DOI: 10.4324/9781315121604-4
Iversen, Stefan, og Henrik Skov Nielsen. (2017). “Invention as Intervention in the Rhetoric of Barack Obama.” Storyworlds 9:1-2, 121-142. DOI: 10.5250/storyworlds.9.1-2.0121
Iversen, Stefan. (2021). “Nimble Navigation: Narrative, Fictionality, and Metanoic Reflexivity in Presidential Rhetoric.” Narrative. 29:2, 258-274. DOI: 10.1353/nar.2021.0014
Iversen, Stefan. (2022). “Disruptive Communication in Political Campaigning: On the Rhetoric of Metanoic Reflexivity.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 52:4. DOI: 10.1080/02773945.2022.2061585
Iversen, Stefan. (2023). ”Fortællinger og retorik.” I Lund, M., Carsten Madsen og Hanne Roer (red.) Retorikkens aktualitet: Grundbog i retorisk kritik., 4. udgave, Hans Reitzel.
Jacobsen, Louise Brix et al. (red.). (2013). Fiktionalitet. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur,
Jacobsen, Louise Brix. (2022). “Paratext.” I Gammelgaard et al. (red.) Fictionality in Literature: Core Concepts Revisited., Ohio State University Press. DOI: 10.26818/9780814215012
Jenkins, Henry, Sam Ford og Joshua Green. (2018). Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press. DOI: 10.18574/nyu/9780814743515.001.0001
Juhasz, Alexandra og Jesse Lerner. (2006). “Introduction: Phony Definitions and Troubling
Taxonomies of the Fake Documentary.” I Juhasz og Lerner (red.) F Is for Phony: Fake Documentary and Truths Undoing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1-35. DOI: 10.5749/j.ctttsntj
Kock, Christian. (2018). “Strangeness as Profundity. A theme in Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Book III.” I Revue internationale de philosophie, 286:4, 375-392. DOI: 10.3917/rip.286.0375
Lanham, Richard A. (1991). A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. Los Angeles: California UP. DOI: 10.1525/9780520912045
Maagaard, Cindie Aaen, Daniel Schäbler og Marianne Wolff Lundholt (red.). (2020). Exploring Fictionality: Conceptions, Test Cases, Discussions, Southern Denmark UP.
Myers, Kelly A. (2011). “Metanoia and the Transformation of Opportunity.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 41:1, 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/02773945.2010.533146
Myers Kelly A. (2016). “Metanoic Movement: The Transformative Power of Regret.” College Composition and Communication, 67:3, 385-410. DOI: 10.58680/ccc201628065
Nahon, K., og Hemsley, J. (2013). Going viral. Malden: Polity.
Nielsen, Henrik Skov, James Phelan og Richard Walsh. (2015). “Ten Theses about Fictionality.” Narrative 23:1: 61-73. DOI: 10.1353/nar.2015.0005
Orange France. (2023). “Orange - WoMen's Football / The Bleues' Highlights (France women's football team World Cup 2023 ad)”. Campaign made by Walker. Tilgået via https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_wLVRYHIS4 (sidst besøgt maj 2024).
Paris, Britt og Joan Donovan. (2019). Deepfakes and Cheap Fakes. The Manipulation of Audio and Visual Evidence. Data and Society Report. https://datasociety. net/library/deepfakes-and-cheap-fakes/ (sidst besøgt december 2023).
Phillips, Whitney og Ryan M. Milner. (2017). The Ambivalent Internet: Mischief, Oddity, and Antagonism Online. Cambridge: Polity.
Rini, R. (2020). “Deepfakes and the epistemic backstop.” Philosophers’ Imprint, 20:24, 1–16.
Shifman, Limor. (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9429.001.0001
Tattersall, Ian og Peter N Névraumont. (2018). Hoax: A History of Deception: 5,000 Years of Fakes, Forgeries, and Fallacies. New York, NY: Black Dog & Leventhal.
Vaccari, C. og Chadwick, A. (2020). “Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News.” Social Media + Society, 1, 1–13. DOI: 10.1177/2056305120903408
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., og De Waal, M. (2018). The Platform Society: Public Values in a
Connective World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
van Huijstee, Mariëtte et al. (2021). “Tackling deepfakes in European policy”. EU, STOA, downloaded fra https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2021)690039 (sidst besøgt december 2023).
Walsh, Lynda. (2006.) Sins against Science: The Scientific Media Hoaxes of Poe, Twain, and Others. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Walsh, Richard. (2007). The Rhetoric of Fictionality. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv16f6jfc
Walsh, Richard. (2019). “Fictionality as Rhetoric: A Distinctive Research Paradigm.” Style 53:4: 397-425. DOI: 10.5325/style.53.4.0397
Walsh, Richard. (2020). “Afterword.” I Maagaard et al. (red.) Exploring Fictionality: Conceptions, Test Cases, Discussions, Southern Denmark UP, 213-237.
##submission.downloads##
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2024 Rhetorica Scandinavica

Detta verk är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande-Ickekommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Open Access; CC Erkännande-IckeKommersiell-IngaBearbetningar 4.0